Literature, I thought, tends to focus on periods of change--or
times when there is potential for change. Writing often follows stories of
transformation and evolution--in worldview, physical development, the development
of a setting or place, spiritual thought, relationships,
etc. Or, perhaps, the work presents a situation in which there is a possibility
for change, but the lack of transformation or stagnancy speaks just as loudly.
I thought of all the works I had read that told dynamic stories of
development. For example, J.D. Salinger's Franny
and Zooey tracks two young people's spiritual maturation in light of
family tragedy, hypocrisy, and the shallow concerns of their peers. The Pastures of Heaven, by John
Steinbeck, chronicles the physical development of a rural California
town--along with the inhabitants who keep the town alive. In George Herbert’s poem
“Love (III),” the speaker begins by resisting God’s grace, but the poem
finishes with the speaker humbly accepting God’s feast. Charlotte Brontë's Jane Eyre tells the story of a maturing young woman,
her education, her employment, and the development of her relationship with Mr.
Rochester. In all of this literature, the writer presents some kind of
transformation--whether major or minor, whether internal or external--and the
readers may identify with characters, situations, or places and find instruction for their own
lives. In this way, my experience with literature has
been educational and enlightening in my own circumstances, relationships, and
outlooks. However, I realized that though this idea may describe a majority of
my interaction with literature, it is not a complete depiction.
Upon further consideration, I thought of works that did not seem
driven by a purpose of recording development. There seems to be no agenda, no deep
“education” intended, driving some literary works besides the act of capturing
life. The words are a practice in perspective and imagery. For example, when I
remember one of Denis Johnson’s short stories in Jesus’ Son, I do not think of a call for reformation against
substance abuse. Instead, the stories honestly capture fragments of a young man’s
life. And the same concept applies to “Winter Trees” by William Carlos
Williams: the poet presents an image--a striking image--without an explicit pedagogical
intention. Perhaps these differing experiences with literature--that is,
experiences in which I do not easily find application in my own situation or
relationships--simply attest to my own failure at interpretation and understanding.
(This is not to say that reading literature in which a personal application may
be more difficult to identify is a waste of time.) Still, literature in its many
forms may simply be an effort to collect pieces of life as we encounter
it--feelings, images, thoughts, ideas--and share it with those who wish to
participate.
I think you may have inherited the Woolsey gift for reflection and introspection. Not surprising. What I am looking from you is an assertiveness in offering your thoughts and insights. You have these. The ones I have heard are generally good. My encouragement, then, is that you show some confidence in verbalizing these ideas. Even a statement such as you end with here -- [it] may simply be an effort to collect pieces of life as we encounter it -- gives us a workable starting point for our study of life from unfamiliar places.
ReplyDelete